COVID-19 UPDATE: We are open! Our team is working and offering consultations via phone, e-mail, and video conferencing.
Free Case Review

We are here to help you. Request your free case review today!

  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please enter a message.
    Please select an option.
Comas & Spinal Cord Injuries

The Glasgow Coma Scale

Rating the Severity of Your Spinal Cord Injury

Intensive care units and medical professionals use a number of scoring systems to rate the severity of diseases and injuries. The Glasgow Coma Scale is a scoring system specific to patients who are experiencing neurological symptoms, such as those caused by spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury.

This neurological scoring system's goal is to provide an analytical framework for understanding the severity of neurological systems that translates across applications and can be used for comparison in the future.

Point System

The Glasgow Coma Scale rates consciousness and neurological symptoms on a scale of 1 to 6, with 6 being the least and 1 the most severe. The criteria for scores are as follows.

Motor Response

  • No motor response = 1 point
  • Responds to pain with decerebate motion = 2 points
  • Flexes in response to pain = 3 points
  • Tries to withdraw from pain = 4 points
  • Tries to localize or prevent pain = 5 points
  • Obeys simple commands as asked = 6 points

Eye Response

  • No eye opening = 1 point
  • Eyes open in response to painful stimuli = 2 points
  • Eyes open in response to speech = 3 points
  • Eyes open spontaneously = 4 points

Verbal response

  • No verbal response = 1 point
  • Incomprehensible moaning or other sounds = 2 points
  • Random, inappropriate, or exclamatory speech, but no conversation = 3 points
  • Confusion and verbal disorientation = 4 points
  • Coherence and orientation = 5 points

To obtain a Glasgow Coma Score, practitioners consider each value separately and also look at a score that combines all three values. These combined values are split into categories of severity. "Severe" Glasgow Scores total 8 and under; "Moderate" 9 through 12, and "Minor" over 13. For example, a patient who tries to withdraw from pain (4 points), opens eyes in response to speech (3 points), and makes incomprehensible moaning sounds (2 points) would have a combined Glasgow Coma Score of 9, which fits in the "Moderate" category.

The Glasgow Score is just one way in which medical professionals assess a patient's condition and compare progress. It can also be useful to attorneys who wish to demonstrate a patient's progress and the severity of injury in court.

San Jose Coma Attorneys: (800) 900-0863

Caputo & Van Der Walde LLP is committed to helping trauma survivors fight back against the individuals whose negligence caused their injuries.

If you are ready to begin your case, contact one of our skilled San Jose spinal cord injury lawyers today for more information on whether you have a valid claim. We can discuss your matter in a case review, free of charge.

Highly Rated & Reviewed

  • “Paul Caputo fought hard to get me the best deal. I am very grateful to have worked with Paul!”

    Susanne

  • “Don was great at explaining everything and I would definitely contact him again in the future should I need his services again.”

    Pete G.

  • “Great service, good staff and wonderful Law firm.”

    Melva W.

  • “The personal touch that everyone had was the thing that sets you apart from everyone else.”

    D.M.

  • “Rich and Shawn will do whatever it takes to thoroughly work for their clients!!!! You will NEVER be disappointed!!!”

    Sylvia E.

  • “Paul is extremely knowledgeable, proactive and goes above and beyond, in fighting for the compensation you deserve.”

    Appy C.

  • “Your meeting with us meant more than you’ll ever know and for which we are so grateful.”

    I.R. and R.R.

  • “Got us a very good settlement”

    Chris G.

  • “Paul was smart and persistent, and we beat a very powerful adversary and he got me the maximum claim.”

    OIiver Y

  • “Excellent knowledge of law, kept me informed and the staff was great.”

    Former Client

  • “I can not say enough about the treatment I received during this time.”

    Steve T.

  • “He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community.”

    Michael W., Attorney

  • “Everyone at the firm was extremely helpful during what is normally a very complicated and convoluted process.”

    Farouk Rice

  • “Paul and his entire team are professional in every way.”

    Earl S.

  • “Paul is a very personable, approachable, highly knowledgeable attorney whose advice to us during a very difficult time is appreciated beyond measure.”

    Irene R.